Ir al contenido principal

The Man Nobody Knew.


(Naomi helped me with this text. Thank you!).

This is the second movie I've seen here about a former director of an American intelligence agency. Taking into account the number of security agencies said to exist in this country, I would have needed several more months to watch a movie even about one director of each agency. Unfortunately, I am leaving the nice city where I'm living. I will miss the giant popcorn and soda combos.

The film is a documentary about William Colby, who served in CIA since its founding and was its director from 1973 to 1976. An unusual aspect of the film is that its screenwriter and director is Colby's second son, Carl. So, it is a very personal work. I was interested in how a son would handle his contradicting feelings about his father's actions, especially in the case of such a controversial public servant as William Colby.

Colby's career was the archetype of the American intelligence agency's effort to control the postwar world and to stop the spread of communism. In some way, the positions he occupied and the tasks he completed reflect the evolution of American self-image as the pre-eminent world power. As any other empire in the past, they needed to justify their hegemony, especially to the US public.

Colby's first missions were in the Office of Strategic Services (OSS), fighting against Germany during the Second World War. US officials were the champions of freedom then. As a member of the newly created CIA, Colby worked in Rome in the 50's. As is well known, a complex system was designed to prevent the communists from winning the power in Italy. Colby, a staunch Catholic, was the perfect man to manage this system, which used close collaboration between Catholic Church, Christian Democrat party and Italian secret services. The “champions of freedom” knew who the Italians ought to vote for and thus tried to determine elections' results. I was surprised at the grade of relationships between Italy's powerful people and the American agents. According to the documentary, Colby's and Prime Minister De Gasperi's families were friends.

In the 60's Colby became the CIA's station chief in Vietnam. During this third step in Colby's career, it's arguable wether American fought for the liberty of Vietnam. In Saigon, Colby's family was also friends with Vietnam's president, Diem. One of the problems with being friend of your hosts in foreign countries is that you have to look the other way when you decide to overthrow and assassinate them, as happened with Diem. As an ultimate effort to win the war, Colby launched the controversial Phoenix program, a terrorist attempt to destroy Vietnamese infrastructure. This part of the documentary is different, with fewer interviews and more images. These terrible images from the war were precisely what changed the way most of the American public looked at the the US role in the world and that war, gradually withdrawing their support. They realized that people like Colby were not the champions of freedom, but hypocritical death angels. At the end of the documentary, when Colby was holding the post of director of the agency, in the early 70's , familiar faces appeared on the screen: George H.W. Bush and Donald Rumsfeld. Nobody seemed to be surprised in the theater.

Comentarios

Entradas populares de este blog

Cristoforo Colombo, genius of the sea.

Mi primera quincena en la Costa Oeste ha sido placentera y enriquecedora. El oído lucha contra el idioma del que pretendo apoderarme y el corazón contra las nostalgias. Solo la tristeza por la grave enfermedad de un amigo y compañero ha oscurecido mis primeros días aquí. El despacho que me han asignado y que comparto con otros turistas académicos es una hermosa biblioteca con una chimenea que ignoro si se encenderá en invierno. Hay una buena colección de libros sobre historia de la ciencia y de la tecnología. Quizá incluso más que en otro sitio que conozco: la rebotica aragonesa de Valencia. Comento el primer libro que llamó la atención en mi nuevo despacho. Se trata de un librillo editado en 1990 por el "Comiato Nazionale per le Celebrazioni del V Centenario della scoperta dell'America". Una de las cosas que llama la atención de muchos españoles cuando pasean por los USA es que la inmensa comunidad ítalo-americana se considera a sí misma la heredera del hecho del "d...

Historia de la guerra de España. Vicente Rojo.

Supongamos que existe algo parecido a la neutralidad en historia, es decir, que los hechos ocurridos en el pasado pueden aprehenderse despojados de todo sesgo o prejuicio. Supongamos también que las personalidades individuales afectan con sus particularidades y talentos al devenir histórico y supongamos, por último, que la historia militar, es decir, lo de las batallitas y los movimientos y los repliegues, etc. es algo importante. Asumiendo todo esto, llegaríamos a la conclusión de que el general Vicente Rojo Lluch fue uno de los españoles más importantes del siglo XX. Sin embargo, este valenciano no tiene ni calles ni plazas dedicadas en ninguna ciudad grande. La razón es fácil de adivinar: se mantuvo leal al gobierno español y, por tanto, acabó en el mando de los perdedores. Mala suerte. Para mi cumpleaños, mi cuadrilla de amigos, me regaló este libro, ¡ muchas gracias, Enrique! En él, se publica el último manuscrito inédito del general, redactado durante su exilio. Jorge Martínez Re...

The man who shot Liberty Valance.

La echaron hace unas semanas en la 2. Jaime nos avisó y yo la disfruté mucho. Al fin y al cabo, siempre se había dicho que era el mejor western de la historia. Al menos, hasta que Eastwood mató el género con "Sin perdón". La peli está ambientada en esa frontera que avanzaba imparable hacia el oeste a lo largo de todo el XIX. Los colonos europeos iban sustituyendo a los pobres indios, aunque quizá el verbo "sustituir" no sea el más adecuado. Paso a paso, y sobre todo, después de la compra de Louisiana, los Estados Unidos se convertían en el gigante del futuro. En la peli aparece el proceso de transformación de "territories" en "states". El guión edulcora este proceso y hace que los partidarios de formar un nuevo estado sean los pequeños propietarios, mientras que los partidarios de mantener el status de territorio, que, al parecer, es algo con menos leyes y normas, son los "grandes ganaderos". Bendita democracia. Para que acabemos de ent...